chore: format cuda code #6508

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 1133 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1268 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]`	125.3 µs	113.7 µs	+10.2%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	555.7 µs	495.5 µs	+12.16%

_{Comparing ad/format-cuda-code (4c043ce) with develop (cb42321)²}

1268 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (873a7fb) during the generation of this report, so cb42321 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩