feat: mask compute to lazy mask execution #6485
Open
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
Feb 13, 2026 in 0s
Performance Regression: -49.83%
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 16 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1118 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1268 skipped benchmarks1
⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.9, 0.9)] |
1.3 ms | 2.4 ms | -48.65% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.01, 0.9)] |
1.2 ms | 2.4 ms | -49.83% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.1, 0.9)] |
1.2 ms | 2.3 ms | -47.32% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.1, 0.01)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -38.3% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.01, 0.1)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -39.85% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.5, 0.01)] |
1.2 ms | 1.8 ms | -34.56% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.01, 0.5)] |
1.2 ms | 2.1 ms | -42.34% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.9, 0.01)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -38.33% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.5, 0.1)] |
1.2 ms | 1.9 ms | -36.21% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.5, 0.9)] |
1.2 ms | 2.3 ms | -47.29% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.5, 0.5)] |
1.2 ms | 2.1 ms | -42.36% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.9, 0.1)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -39.83% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.1, 0.1)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -39.82% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.01, 0.01)] |
1.2 ms | 2 ms | -38.36% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.9, 0.5)] |
1.2 ms | 2.1 ms | -42.38% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_dict_mask[(0.1, 0.5)] |
1.2 ms | 2.1 ms | -42.39% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_200k_dispersed |
5.6 ms | 5.1 ms | +11.29% |
Comparing ji/mask-compute-fn-remove (af76682) with develop (d9d75da)
Footnotes
-
1268 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading