-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
feat: BufferExec waits for hash join dynamic filters before buffering #21350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
LiaCastaneda
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
LiaCastaneda:lia/buffer-exec-dynamic-filter-20778
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c6c5afd
feat: BufferExec waits for hash join dynamic filters before buffering
LiaCastaneda 0c4469f
fix: add missing ProducerKind arg to DynamicFilterPhysicalExpr::new i…
LiaCastaneda f96dbb4
fix: add new config option to information_schema.slt snapshot and ena…
LiaCastaneda 20fadcf
test: add BufferExec dynamic filter wait tests and update information…
LiaCastaneda d043841
fix: remove broken intra-doc link to BufferExec in dynamic_filters.rs
LiaCastaneda 9977a22
docs: update configs.md with hash_join_buffering_dynamic_filter_wait_ms
LiaCastaneda c1d3552
Merge branch 'main' into lia/buffer-exec-dynamic-filter-20778
Dandandan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we enable this by default? I think now it should be safe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion it should be opt-in as it increases memory usage and in future we want to make parallelism / pipelining scheduling probably more explicit.