Skip to content

Actions: apache/datafusion

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Dev #69050: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
Queued rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
Queued
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Large files PR check #31970: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
45s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
45s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Dependencies #12023: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
Queued rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
Queued
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually CodeQL #6771: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
In progress rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
In progress
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Rust #66999: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
Queued rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
Queued
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Detect breaking changes #1867: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
Queued rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
Queued
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Labeler #26306: Pull request #22568 synchronize by rluvaton
19s
19s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Labeler #26305: Pull request #22568 edited by rluvaton
19s
19s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Labeler #26304: Pull request #22568 edited by rluvaton
13s
13s
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Dev #69049: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
Queued nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
Queued
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs CodeQL #6770: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
2m 29s nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
2m 29s
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Dependencies #12022: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
In progress nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
In progress
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Rust #66998: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
Queued nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
Queued
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Docs #8166: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
In progress nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
In progress
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Detect breaking changes #1866: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
In progress nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
In progress
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Datafusion extended tests #10960: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
Queued nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
Queued
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Large files PR check #31969: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
1m 10s nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
nathanb9:cte-materialization-poc
1m 10s
POC: CTE materialization for multi-referenced CTEs Labeler #26303: Pull request #22551 synchronize by nathanb9
39s
39s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Rust #66997: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
6m 4s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
6m 4s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Dev #69048: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
5m 45s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
5m 45s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Large files PR check #31968: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
51s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
51s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Dependencies #12021: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
5m 45s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
5m 45s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually CodeQL #6769: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
2m 42s rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
2m 42s
ci(breaking-change-detector): don't use maintain-one-comment and instead do it manually Detect breaking changes #1865: Pull request #22568 reopened by rluvaton
In progress rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
rluvaton:check-breaking-change-detector
In progress
Repeating the same ordered LIMIT over a subquery changes the result Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #50112: Issue comment #22541 (comment) created by hadrian-reppas
20s
20s