Skip to content

[AgentX] vLLM DeepSeek-V4 B200 aggregate / vLLM DeepSeek-V4 B200 聚合配置#2224

Open
cquil11 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
agent/split-pr-2202-b200
Open

[AgentX] vLLM DeepSeek-V4 B200 aggregate / vLLM DeepSeek-V4 B200 聚合配置#2224
cquil11 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
agent/split-pr-2202-b200

Conversation

@cquil11

@cquil11 cquil11 commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Split the B200 portion of [AgentX] vLLM Deepseek-V4 B200/B300 agg #2202 into an independent PR.
  • Preserve the B200 launcher, vLLM image, KV-offload backends, sparse DSV4 attention, mega-MoE settings, CUDA graph configuration, and concurrency search space from the original PR.
  • Keep the change hardware-scoped to the B200 launcher, the B200 config block, and its appended changelog entry.
  • This replacement is merged with the latest origin/main.

Original PR: #2202
Earlier source PR referenced by #2202: #2188

Testing

  • bash -n benchmarks/single_node/agentic/dsv4_fp4_b200_vllm.sh
  • Generated the DSV4 vLLM B200 full-sweep matrix successfully.
  • python -m pytest utils/matrix_logic/ -q — 221 passed.

中文说明

  • [AgentX] vLLM Deepseek-V4 B200/B300 agg #2202 中的 B200 部分拆分为独立 PR。
  • 完整保留原 PR 的 B200 启动器、vLLM 镜像、KV 卸载后端、稀疏 DSV4 attention、mega-MoE 配置、CUDA Graph 配置和并发搜索空间。
  • 变更范围仅包含 B200 启动器、B200 配置块以及追加的变更日志条目。
  • 此替代 PR 已合并最新的 origin/main

原 PR:#2202
#2202 引用的更早来源 PR:#2188

测试

  • bash -n benchmarks/single_node/agentic/dsv4_fp4_b200_vllm.sh
  • 已成功生成 DSV4 vLLM B200 完整扫描矩阵。
  • python -m pytest utils/matrix_logic/ -q — 221 项测试通过。

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! Please reach out to respective companies' CODEOWNER to fill in the latest PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md before pinging core maintainer on Slack for review. In order for the signoff PR check bot to trigger, you must follow the PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md template correctly, including the phrase As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have.

For PR verification, add the full-sweep-fail-fast label (strongly recommended) to this PR — the benchmark sweep only runs on labeled PRs. Use full-sweep-enabled only if you need matrix jobs to keep running past a failure.

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs


感谢你的贡献!请联系相应公司的 CODEOWNER 填写最新的 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md,然后再在 Slack 上联系核心维护者进行审阅。为了触发 signoff PR 检查机器人,你必须正确遵循 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md 模板,包括保留英文语句 As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have

如需进行 PR 验证,请为此 PR 添加 full-sweep-fail-fast 标签(强烈推荐)— 基准测试 sweep 仅在带有标签的 PR 上运行。仅当需要矩阵任务在失败后继续运行时才使用 full-sweep-enabled

PR 作者有责任确保合并后所有 GitHub Action 任务完全通过。 很多时候失败只是偶发抖动(flake),重新运行失败的任务即可解决。参见 GitHub 关于重新运行失败任务的文档

1 similar comment
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! Please reach out to respective companies' CODEOWNER to fill in the latest PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md before pinging core maintainer on Slack for review. In order for the signoff PR check bot to trigger, you must follow the PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md template correctly, including the phrase As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have.

For PR verification, add the full-sweep-fail-fast label (strongly recommended) to this PR — the benchmark sweep only runs on labeled PRs. Use full-sweep-enabled only if you need matrix jobs to keep running past a failure.

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs


感谢你的贡献!请联系相应公司的 CODEOWNER 填写最新的 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md,然后再在 Slack 上联系核心维护者进行审阅。为了触发 signoff PR 检查机器人,你必须正确遵循 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md 模板,包括保留英文语句 As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have

如需进行 PR 验证,请为此 PR 添加 full-sweep-fail-fast 标签(强烈推荐)— 基准测试 sweep 仅在带有标签的 PR 上运行。仅当需要矩阵任务在失败后继续运行时才使用 full-sweep-enabled

PR 作者有责任确保合并后所有 GitHub Action 任务完全通过。 很多时候失败只是偶发抖动(flake),重新运行失败的任务即可解决。参见 GitHub 关于重新运行失败任务的文档

cquil11 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Point the split B200 changelog entry to PR #2224.

中文:将拆分后的 B200 变更日志条目链接到 PR #2224
@cquil11 cquil11 added NVIDIA full-sweep-enabled agentx AgentX benchmarks, recipes, and infrastructure labels Jul 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
set -eo pipefail

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Line 2 changed set -euo pipefail to set -eo pipefail, dropping nounset — this is the only script among all 24 in benchmarks/single_node/agentic/ that doesn't use -u. The rewrite replaced every ${VAR:-default}-guarded reference ($DCP_SIZE, $SLURM_JOB_ID, $SLURMD_NODENAME, $MODEL_PATH, $KV_OFFLOAD_BACKEND) with bare $VAR forms, which is why -u had to go; the near-identical dsv4_fp4_b300_vllm.sh shows the same optional-var pattern works fine with -u kept and ${VAR:-} guards. Recommend restoring set -euo pipefail and guarding the new bare references, to keep this script's safety net consistent with its siblings.

Extended reasoning...

The bug: Line 2 of dsv4_fp4_b200_vllm.sh was changed from set -euo pipefail to set -eo pipefail, silently dropping the nounset (-u) flag. Every other script in benchmarks/single_node/agentic/ — including the near-identical dsv4_fp4_b300_vllm.sh, plus dsv4_fp4_mi355x_vllm.sh, dsv4_fp4_b200_sglang.sh, dsv4_fp8_h200.sh, and all the kimik2.5_*/qwen3.5_*/minimaxm3_* variants — still uses set -euo pipefail. This script is now the sole outlier in the directory.\n\nWhy it happened: The diff rewrote several previously-guarded optional-variable references into bare, unguarded forms: DCP_SIZE=${DCP_SIZE:-1} became an if [ -z "$DCP_SIZE" ]; then DCP_SIZE=1; fi block (which still reads the bare $DCP_SIZE first), ${SLURM_JOB_ID:-}/${SLURMD_NODENAME:-unknown} became bare $SLURM_JOB_ID/$SLURMD_NODENAME, ${MODEL_PATH:-} became bare $MODEL_PATH, and the new case "$KV_OFFLOAD_BACKEND" in "") branch reads $KV_OFFLOAD_BACKEND unguarded (note it isn't even part of check_env_vars, so it can legitimately be unset). None of these would survive set -u if the variable is genuinely unset, so -u had to be dropped to make the rewritten code work as written.\n\nWhy this is avoidable: The sibling dsv4_fp4_b300_vllm.sh proves -u and this exact optional-variable pattern coexist fine: it keeps set -euo pipefail while using DCP_SIZE="${DCP_SIZE:-1}", declare -p SLURM_JOB_ID >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ -n "$SLURM_JOB_ID" ], and similar guards for MODEL_PATH. The new case statement here could equally have matched on "${KV_OFFLOAD_BACKEND:-}" instead of the bare variable. So dropping -u wasn't required by the case-statement refactor — it was a side effect of un-guarding several other references at the same time.\n\nImpact: With -u disabled, a future typo in a variable name anywhere in this script (e.g. RESULT_DIR misspelled as RESUT_DIR) will silently expand to an empty string and continue executing rather than aborting immediately with an "unbound variable" error — exactly the failure mode -u exists to catch. As written today the script runs correctly (all currently-referenced optional vars are handled, and required vars are separately validated by check_env_vars), so there's no concrete runtime failure right now. This is a latent robustness/consistency regression rather than an active bug.\n\nProof by example: Suppose a future edit adds echo "Writing to $RESUT_DIR" (a typo of $RESULT_DIR) somewhere in this script. With set -eo pipefail (current state), $RESUT_DIR expands to "", the echo prints "Writing to ", and the script continues — the typo goes unnoticed until output is inspected downstream. With set -euo pipefail (every sibling script's setting), the same line would immediately abort with RESUT_DIR: unbound variable, catching the bug at the point of introduction. This is precisely why the convention exists across all 23 other scripts in the directory.\n\nFix: Restore set -euo pipefail on line 2 and guard the newly-unguarded references the same way dsv4_fp4_b300_vllm.sh does: DCP_SIZE="${DCP_SIZE:-1}"/PCP_SIZE="${PCP_SIZE:-1}", [[ -n "${SLURM_JOB_ID:-}" ]] / ${SLURMD_NODENAME:-unknown}, [[ -n "${MODEL_PATH:-}" ]], and case "${KV_OFFLOAD_BACKEND:-}" in.

cquil11 and others added 3 commits July 15, 2026 19:41
Carry the B200-only launcher, config search space, and changelog scope from PR #2202.

中文:拆分 DeepSeek-V4 B200 vLLM AgentX 配方,仅保留 PR #2202 中的 B200 启动器、配置搜索空间和变更日志范围。
Point the split B200 changelog entry to PR #2224.

中文:将拆分后的 B200 变更日志条目链接到 PR #2224
@ivanium ivanium force-pushed the agent/split-pr-2202-b200 branch from 53cf054 to 455eabc Compare July 15, 2026 19:48
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

agentx AgentX benchmarks, recipes, and infrastructure full-sweep-enabled NVIDIA

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants