Skip to content

perf[buffer]: iteration for fallible operations with validity #8120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 22 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

f

2c314ab
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Open

perf[buffer]: iteration for fallible operations with validity #8120

f
2c314ab
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis succeeded May 28, 2026

Performance Gate Passed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 1264 untouched benchmarks
🆕 3 new benchmarks
⏩ 1 skipped benchmark1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
🆕 Simulation cast_u32_to_u8[65536] N/A 250.6 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation cast_i32_to_u32[65536] N/A 832.7 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation cast_u16_to_u32[65536] N/A 210.7 µs N/A
⚡ Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] 304.4 ns 246.1 ns +23.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing ji/fast-iter-valid (2c314ab) with develop (126c431)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1 benchmark was skipped, so the baseline result was used instead. If it was deleted from the codebase, click here and archive it to remove it from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ