Skip to content

worker deployment replace-version-compute-config#1001

Open
jaypipes wants to merge 1 commit intotemporalio:mainfrom
jaypipes:jaypipes/replace-version-compute-config
Open

worker deployment replace-version-compute-config#1001
jaypipes wants to merge 1 commit intotemporalio:mainfrom
jaypipes:jaypipes/replace-version-compute-config

Conversation

@jaypipes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds implementation of the UpdateWorkerDeploymentVersionComputeConfig gRPC API call with a temporal worker deployment replace-version-compute-config CLI command. I used replace instead of update to be more explicit about the replacement semantics used by the command.

@jaypipes jaypipes requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 18:27
@jaypipes jaypipes force-pushed the jaypipes/replace-version-compute-config branch from afab676 to f6fdb9b Compare April 27, 2026 18:27
@jaypipes jaypipes changed the title worker deployment replace-version-compute-config` worker deployment replace-version-compute-config Apr 27, 2026
@jaypipes jaypipes requested a review from chaptersix April 27, 2026 20:28
Comment thread internal/temporalcli/commands.yaml Outdated
@jaypipes jaypipes force-pushed the jaypipes/replace-version-compute-config branch from f6fdb9b to f6601f4 Compare April 28, 2026 16:39
Adds implementation of the `UpdateWorkerDeploymentVersionComputeConfig`
gRPC API call with a `temporal worker deployment
replace-version-compute-config` CLI command. I used `replace` instead of
`update` to be more explicit about the replacement semantics used by the
command.

Signed-off-by: Jay Pipes <jay.pipes@temporal.io>
@jaypipes jaypipes force-pushed the jaypipes/replace-version-compute-config branch from f6601f4 to bdd4c48 Compare April 28, 2026 16:40
@jaypipes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@chaptersix I don't believe the test failure has anything to do with this particular PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants