Skip to content

feat: reduce AMI data volume size#2090

Draft
jfreeland wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/disk
Draft

feat: reduce AMI data volume size#2090
jfreeland wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/disk

Conversation

@jfreeland
Copy link

@jfreeland jfreeland commented Mar 18, 2026

When we build an instance we explicitly specify the size of the data volume. The data volume that's built as part of this AMI should be 1GB.

@jfreeland jfreeland marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2026 18:53
@jfreeland jfreeland requested review from a team as code owners March 18, 2026 18:53
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 18, 2026 18:54
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR reduces the default size of the secondary EBS data volume in the ARM64 Nix Packer template, lowering the initial AMI/snapshot data footprint.

Changes:

  • Decrease /dev/xvdh EBS volume size from 8 GiB to 1 GiB in the Packer amazon-ebssurrogate source configuration.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

@jfreeland jfreeland closed this Mar 18, 2026
@jfreeland jfreeland reopened this Mar 18, 2026
@samrose samrose marked this pull request as draft March 18, 2026 19:22
@jfreeland jfreeland changed the title feat: reduce initial data volume size feat: reduce AMI data volume size Mar 25, 2026
postgresorioledb-17: "17.6.0.055-orioledb"
postgres17: "17.6.1.098"
postgres15: "15.14.1.098"
postgresorioledb-17: "17.6.0.055-orioledb-testdatavol"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these need to be reset before this is merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants