chore: minor clean-up

[Planeshifter]

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

Follow-up fixes for commits merged to develop between 2026-05-04 14:00 PDT (a3a5677b7b) and 2026-05-05 03:03 PDT (c5fad82b2).

This pull request:

• Fixes documentation and header-guard inconsistencies introduced in 73653a29d for lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/strided/distances/dcorrelation: aligns the README tagline, JS-API descriptions, removes an orphan <!-- </equation> --> tag, deduplicates a $ExpectError line in docs/types/test.ts that masked a missing 5-arg negative case, and renames the include guard to STDLIB_STATS_STRIDED_DISTANCES_DCORRELATION_H to match the full package path.
• Aligns lib/node_modules/@stdlib/blas/ext/base/gcartesian-power with sibling dcartesian-power/scartesian-power (originating commit 181b4cc56): switches strideOut1/strideOut2 README descriptions from "stride length for" to "stride length of", and rewrites the createBenchmark JSDoc summaries in benchmark/benchmark.js and benchmark/benchmark.ndarray.js

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Validation. Each finding was independently flagged by at least one reviewer agent and re-verified by re-reading the diff and the affected file. Compliance was checked against docs/style-guides and against established sibling packages (dcartesian-power/scartesian-power for the cartesian-power family, dscal/sscal/gscal/zscal for the BLAS ndarray wrappers, deuclidean/dcosine-distance/dminkowski for strided distances). Deliberately excluded: anything requiring interpretation, anything that could not be validated without touching code outside the diff window, and several false positives that did not survive verification (e.g., empty <intro>/<notes> README sections in cscal — siblings have the same structure; an alleged missing scartesian-power benchmark "Creates" — the file already uses imperative).

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was prepared by Claude Code: the diff window was reviewed by four parallel agents (two style-guide compliance, two bug-hunting), every flagged issue was re-verified against the actual files in the worktree, false positives were filtered, and the surviving fixes were applied and grouped into per-package commits. Maintainer review of every change is expected before merge.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/ext/base/gcartesian-power	$\color{green}364/364$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}34/34$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}364/364$ $\color{green}+0.00%$
blas/ext/base/scartesian-power	$\color{green}462/462$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}39/39$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}462/462$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
stats/strided/distances/dcorrelation	$\color{green}366/366$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}15/15$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}366/366$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.