Skip to content

hotfix: fix storageClassName CEL validation#1857

Open
patrykw-splunk wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
hotfix/fix-storageclass-cel-validation
Open

hotfix: fix storageClassName CEL validation#1857
patrykw-splunk wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
hotfix/fix-storageclass-cel-validation

Conversation

@patrykw-splunk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@patrykw-splunk patrykw-splunk commented Apr 20, 2026

Description

It fixes storageClassName validation (#1856).

Key Changes

It updates CEL validation in api/v4/common_types.go.

Testing and Verification

Automated and manual tests

Related Issues

None

PR Checklist

  • Code changes adhere to the project's coding standards.
  • Relevant unit and integration tests are included.
  • Documentation has been updated accordingly.
  • All tests pass locally.
  • The PR description follows the project's guidelines.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Assistant Lite bot:
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contribution License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment with the exact sentence copied from below.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


Patryk Wasielewski seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gabrielm-splunk gabrielm-splunk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please amend the author before it gets pushed to develop please. Don't want to run into similar issues we had as we did during 3.1.0 release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants