build(deps): bump golang to 1.26.0

[slack-cli-releaser]

Automatic update to the latest release of Go

[mwbrooks]

✅ Thanks @dependabot!

[mwbrooks]

Looks like the new Golang version is introducing some new lint rules.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 68.18182% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 64.71%. Comparing base (113aa42) to head (95e3ecf).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cmd/feedback/feedback.go	54.54%	5 Missing ⚠️
internal/pkg/create/create.go	20.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
cmd/triggers/access.go	75.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
cmd/app/app.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/datastore/datastore.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/project/create.go	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/root.go	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/triggers/create.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/app/link.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
cmd/manifest/validate.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #339      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.73%   64.71%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         212      212              
  Lines       17809    17805       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        11528    11523       -5     
- Misses       5207     5209       +2     
+ Partials     1074     1073       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mwbrooks]

🤯 Thanks so much for making these updates @zimeg! I've seen other projects struggling with these new linter rules.

🧹 Overall, I think the rules are helping to create more consist code, but it was a lot to update in order to bump our Golang.

🙇🏻 Thanks for doing it!

[mwbrooks]

note: I remember in a previous life we had this syntax and had to remove it due to the linter. Now it's back 😆

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks Woo! And thanks for help in keeping us current with these changes 👾 ✨

I'm wondering if this is more strict enforcement of this formatting syntax to remove chances of generating an unexpected template placeholder %s in the text functions that might not've been caught earlier... To me this is a verbose but kind change to keep!

Let's merge this to build with confidence in the latest 🌚 🚢