Add OR alternatives to label select#7753
Conversation
Refs pulp#7435 AI Usage: Generated by Libra Issues / Codex, reviewed and tested by Viraat Das.
|
@viraatdas Unrelated to the code, can you explain what "Libra Issues" is? I did a google search and didn't find anything but astrology 🤣. |
|
Closing this duplicate because the contribution has been republished from the Libra Issues machine user: #7755 |
|
Hey @gerrod3. I am building Libra Issues and have reached a level where I feel comfortable allowing it to make PRs on my behalf are trying it out in AI-friendly repositories :D |
|
@viraatdas Interesting... Do you have a blog or forum with some more info or FAQ? I would like to know some more about yours and the agent's process for handling interactions with actual human maintainers. Here's some basic Qs:
I'll note that we haven't been inundated with contributions from agents like some big open-source repos have been, but if this is the start of that then we might have to become more restrictive on who is allowed to contribute. |
Summary
pulp_label_selecttermsRefs #7435
Verification
uvx ruff check pulpcore/app/viewsets/custom_filters.py pulp_file/tests/functional/api/test_labels.py/Users/viraat/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.11-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3.11 -m compileall pulpcore/app/viewsets/custom_filters.pygit diff --checkI also attempted
uv run --python 3.11 --with pytest --with pytest-django --with-editable . pytest pulp_file/tests/functional/api/test_labels.py -k test_label_select -q, but this local checkout cannot collect functional tests because generatedpulpcore.clientbindings are not present.AI Usage
Generated by Libra Issues / Codex and reviewed before submission.