Skip to content

OSDOCS-16950#CQA work for Stor6 - LSO#115348

Open
lpettyjo wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-16950-lso
Open

OSDOCS-16950#CQA work for Stor6 - LSO#115348
lpettyjo wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-16950-lso

Conversation

@lpettyjo

@lpettyjo lpettyjo commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 14, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 14, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-create-cr.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-create-cr.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-create-cr.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-create-cr.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-create-cr.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/persistent-storage-local-deleting-resources-overview.adoc Outdated
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 14, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@lpettyjo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 branch/enterprise-4.22 branch/enterprise-5.0 merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants