Open
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was
linked to
issues
Apr 9, 2026
sarina
commented
Apr 9, 2026
| .. _Override Text Content in a Library-Referenced Component: | ||
|
|
||
| Override Text Content in a Library-Referenced Component | ||
| ####################################################### |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gaps to verify before publishing:
- The actual UI button labels — I used :guilabel:Edit and :guilabel:Save based on the spec description, but you'll want to confirm the exact labels in the Ulmo UI.
- Whether the prerequisite about "published" library content is correct — the issue spec says the component needs to be published in the library first.
| .. _Override the Title of Library-Sourced Content: | ||
|
|
||
| Override the Title of Library-Sourced Content | ||
| ############################################# |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Decisions made: I split the steps by content type because the UI entry point is different — the course outline for structural content vs. the unit view for components. The spec doesn't describe the exact UI mechanics (pencil icon, click-to-edit, etc.), so those are reasonable assumptions based on how Studio typically works and should be verified against the actual Verawood UI.
Gaps to verify:
- The exact UI interaction for renaming (pencil icon vs. double-click vs. a settings panel) — the spec doesn't specify, only that titles should be "editable."
- Whether the rename UI differs between the course outline and unit views in any meaningful way that would require additional steps.
| .. _Override Text Content in a Library-Sourced Structural Block: | ||
|
|
||
| Override Text Content in a Library-Sourced Structural Block | ||
| ########################################################### |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gaps to verify before publishing:
- The UI entry point — whether the text component is accessible for editing directly from within a library-sourced unit in the unit view, or if there are any extra navigation steps required.
- Whether "structural block" is the term used in the Studio UI, or whether the product uses "section," "subsection," and "unit" exclusively. If users won't recognize "structural block," the title and intro may need adjusting.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New documentation:
AI Disclaimer
I used Claude liberally in writing these docs, with only light edits as I'm not very familiar with the overrides feature. However I thought the Concept doc was pretty great as generated. Claude chat log
Notes to Reviewers
Please provide any necessary screenshots and I will incorporate them.
Please respond to document questions about Claude's assumptions.