Preserve State in State Refinements without Postcondition#191
Open
Preserve State in State Refinements without Postcondition#191
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #51.
Fixes a bug where
@StateRefinementannotations with afromcondition but notocondition were incorrectly treated as state transitions. This caused LiquidJava to weaken object state after calls that should only check a precondition, losing precise information needed by later calls.Root cause
When a state refinement had
from != nullandto == null, the verifier created a post-state by copyingfromintoto, which turned a pure state check into an actual transition. Fixed this by removing this part of the logic.This means that, for example, a method that should only require
x(this) > 0could overwrite a more precise state such asx(this) == 2with the weaker predicatex(this) > 0.