chore: upgrade Vite 8.0.13

[react-server-bot]

Automated daily upgrade of Vite, Rolldown, and/or Vitest to the latest available versions.

Vite: 8.0.12 → 8.0.13

Updated locations

• packages/react-server/package.json — vite, rolldown
• test/package.json — vite, rolldown, vitest, @vitest/ui
• packages/rsc/package.json — vitest, @vitest/*
• packages/create-react-server/test/package.json — vitest
• package.json — all pnpm.overrides for Vite
• pnpm-lock.yaml

Smoke test

• Dev mode — hello world test passed ✅
• Build+start mode — hello world test passed ✅

[github-actions]

⚡ Flight Protocol Benchmark

Commit: 07a13cd

Serialization (renderToReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	223.1K	34.9K	🟢 +539.3%
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.3K	349	🟢 +562.5%
react: deep nested (100)	17.4K	5.7K	🟢 +203.5%
react: product list (50)	6.7K	2.0K	🟢 +230.9%
react: large table (500x10)	274	87	🟢 +213.3%
data: primitives	178.4K	43.6K	🟢 +309.3%
data: large string (100KB)	7.1K	6.2K	🟢 +13.5%
data: nested objects (20)	61.2K	27.6K	🟢 +121.8%
data: large array (10K)	126	126	⚪ -0.0%
data: Map & Set	12.2K	6.4K	🟢 +88.7%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	165.1K	42.6K	🟢 +287.5%
data: typed arrays	38.9K	14.3K	🟢 +172.1%
data: mixed payload	9.5K	4.5K	🟢 +112.8%

Prerender (prerender)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc ops/s	mean
react: minimal element	228.4K	4.4 µs
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.0K	489.7 µs
react: deep nested (100)	16.1K	62.0 µs
react: product list (50)	6.3K	159.9 µs
react: large table (500x10)	265	3.77 ms
data: primitives	187.6K	5.3 µs
data: large string (100KB)	654	1.53 ms
data: nested objects (20)	60.8K	16.4 µs
data: large array (10K)	125	8.01 ms
data: Map & Set	12.6K	79.6 µs
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	181.8K	5.5 µs
data: typed arrays	616	1.62 ms
data: mixed payload	8.5K	117.4 µs

Deserialization (createFromReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	168.0K	144.8K	🟢 +16.1%
react: shallow wide (1000)	19.2K	1.5K	🟢 +1172.5%
react: deep nested (100)	99.2K	20.1K	🟢 +394.4%
react: product list (50)	50.7K	13.3K	🟢 +281.2%
react: large table (500x10)	3.8K	2.2K	🟢 +72.8%
data: primitives	138.9K	130.6K	🟢 +6.3%
data: large string (100KB)	43.2K	38.7K	🟢 +11.5%
data: nested objects (20)	85.2K	69.7K	🟢 +22.2%
data: large array (10K)	262	248	🟢 +5.4%
data: Map & Set	16.4K	14.8K	🟢 +10.5%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	144.9K	118.9K	🟢 +21.9%
data: typed arrays	63.5K	49.4K	🟢 +28.5%
data: mixed payload	25.1K	15.0K	🟢 +67.7%

Roundtrip (serialize + deserialize)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	117.6K	28.4K	🟢 +314.5%
react: shallow wide (1000)	1.8K	309	🟢 +469.1%
react: deep nested (100)	15.3K	4.8K	🟢 +217.2%
react: product list (50)	5.7K	1.7K	🟢 +232.2%
react: large table (500x10)	252	87	🟢 +188.2%
data: primitives	96.2K	31.9K	🟢 +201.8%
data: large string (100KB)	5.7K	6.3K	🔴 -9.2%
data: nested objects (20)	38.8K	22.7K	🟢 +70.9%
data: large array (10K)	84	79	🟢 +6.9%
data: Map & Set	6.9K	4.5K	🟢 +53.1%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	92.0K	34.4K	🟢 +167.7%
data: typed arrays	30.6K	12.2K	🟢 +151.2%
data: mixed payload	6.6K	3.4K	🟢 +95.3%

Legend & methodology

Indicators: 🟢 > 1% faster | 🔴 > 1% slower | ⚪ within noise margin

vs webpack: compares @lazarv/rsc against react-server-dom-webpack within the same run.
vs baseline: compares @lazarv/rsc against the previous main branch run.

Values shown are operations/second (higher is better). Each scenario runs for at least 100 iterations with warmup.

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple scenarios are more meaningful than any single number.

[codecov-commenter]

❌ 3 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
1115	3	1112	9

View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank-ts > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.000896s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank-ts > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.00122s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank-ts > dev mode starts and serves the app

Stack Traces | 0.0093s run time

AssertionError: dev mode should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:66:56

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[github-actions]

⚡ Benchmark Results

	PR 5a45e00	main 9cd6bb6
Config	50 connections, 10s/test	50 connections, 10s/test

Benchmark	Req/s	vs main	Avg Latency	vs main	P99 Latency	Throughput
minimal	1405	🔴 -6.4%	34.98 ms	🔴 +6.9%	74 ms	0.9 MB/s
small	1475	⚪ -0.6%	33.28 ms	⚪ +0.6%	59 ms	1.5 MB/s
medium	407	⚪ -0.8%	121.63 ms	⚪ +0.6%	179 ms	6.0 MB/s
large	46	🔴 -7.3%	1016.7 ms	🔴 +4.8%	1918 ms	4.7 MB/s
deep	913	🔴 -5.5%	54.02 ms	🔴 +5.9%	88 ms	3.1 MB/s
wide	73	🟢 +4.9%	665.83 ms	🟢 -5.5%	1279 ms	4.0 MB/s
cached	3412	⚪ +0.6%	14.18 ms	⚪ -0.4%	28 ms	50.1 MB/s
client-min	539	🔴 -3.1%	91.96 ms	🔴 +3.6%	151 ms	2.3 MB/s
client-small	552	🔴 -2.1%	89.44 ms	🔴 +2.0%	140 ms	2.5 MB/s
client-med	391	🔴 -4.7%	125.94 ms	🔴 +4.4%	189 ms	7.2 MB/s
client-large	86	🟢 +2.4%	555.68 ms	🟢 -2.1%	1065 ms	9.0 MB/s
client-deep	500	🔴 -4.7%	99.1 ms	🔴 +5.4%	146 ms	3.5 MB/s
client-wide	141	⚪ +0.3%	342.91 ms	🟢 -1.1%	653 ms	8.2 MB/s
rsc-client-large	1211	🔴 -3.8%	40.64 ms	🔴 +4.0%	62 ms	3.1 MB/s
rsc-client-wide	1251	🔴 -3.4%	39.33 ms	🔴 +3.6%	61 ms	3.2 MB/s
static-json	9847	🔴 -11.8%	4.61 ms	🔴 +22.3%	14 ms	4.1 MB/s
static-js	9603	🔴 -11.2%	4.65 ms	🔴 +17.1%	15 ms	12.0 MB/s
404-miss	5352	🔴 -16.7%	8.85 ms	🔴 +23.9%	20 ms	0.7 MB/s
hybrid-min	543	🔴 -3.8%	90.94 ms	🔴 +3.9%	142 ms	2.6 MB/s
hybrid-small	506	🔴 -5.3%	97.88 ms	🔴 +5.6%	142 ms	2.9 MB/s
hybrid-medium	261	🔴 -1.3%	188.09 ms	⚪ +0.8%	277 ms	11.1 MB/s
hybrid-large	43	🔴 -3.7%	1093.43 ms	🔴 +5.0%	1976 ms	13.8 MB/s
hybrid-deep	407	🔴 -1.9%	121.32 ms	🔴 +1.6%	184 ms	5.6 MB/s
hybrid-wide	62	🔴 -5.6%	764.41 ms	🔴 +1.7%	1018 ms	12.2 MB/s
hybrid-cached	2995	🔴 -8.0%	16.17 ms	🔴 +9.3%	30 ms	127.2 MB/s
hybrid-client-min	558	🔴 -5.6%	88.33 ms	🔴 +5.7%	135 ms	2.4 MB/s
hybrid-client-small	543	🔴 -8.5%	91.05 ms	🔴 +9.3%	136 ms	2.6 MB/s
hybrid-client-medium	398	🔴 -3.1%	123.96 ms	🔴 +3.4%	185 ms	7.4 MB/s
hybrid-client-large	88	🟢 +3.8%	557.87 ms	🟢 -3.0%	1009 ms	9.2 MB/s
hybrid-client-deep	485	🔴 -9.2%	101.71 ms	🔴 +9.7%	151 ms	3.5 MB/s
hybrid-client-wide	149	🟢 +5.5%	328.06 ms	🟢 -5.5%	618 ms	8.7 MB/s

Legend

🟢 > 1% improvement | 🔴 > 1% regression | ⚪ within noise margin

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple routes are more meaningful than any single number.