Skip to content

Conversation

@DineshThumma9
Copy link
Contributor

Please ensure you have read the contribution guide before creating a pull request.

Link to Issue or Description of Change

1. Link to an existing issue (if applicable):

2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change:

Problem:
Was using print instead of logger for warning message

*Solution:
Refactored

Testing Plan

Unit Tests:

  • I have added or updated unit tests for my change.
  • All unit tests pass locally.

Please include a summary of passed pytest results.

Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
  • I have manually tested my changes end-to-end.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @DineshThumma9, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the error handling mechanism within the MCP session manager by transitioning from basic print statements to the more robust and configurable Python logging module. This change improves the maintainability and observability of warning messages, especially during session cleanup. Corresponding unit tests have been updated to correctly verify the new logging behavior.

Highlights

  • Refactored Error Logging: Replaced direct print statements with logger.warning for error messages during MCP session cleanup, ensuring consistent and structured logging.
  • Enhanced Error Context: The logger.warning call now includes exc_info=True, which automatically adds exception information to the log message for better debugging.
  • Updated Unit Tests: Modified the test_close_with_errors unit test to mock the logger and assert its calls, removing the reliance on StringIO for capturing output.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@adk-bot adk-bot added the mcp [Component] Issues about MCP support label Jan 30, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly refactors the code to use logger.warning instead of print for logging errors during MCP session cleanup, which is a good improvement for standardized logging. The unit tests have also been updated to reflect this change. I've provided a couple of suggestions to further improve the log message clarity and make the corresponding test more robust. Overall, this is a solid change.

Comment on lines 437 to 440
logger.warning(
f'Warning: Error during MCP session cleanup for:{session_key}',
exc_info=True,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The log message can be improved for clarity and to follow standard logging practices. The logger.warning call already indicates the severity level, so including 'Warning:' in the message string is redundant. Also, a missing space after the colon in the f-string affects readability.

Suggested change
logger.warning(
f'Warning: Error during MCP session cleanup for:{session_key}',
exc_info=True,
)
logger.warning(
f'Error during MCP session cleanup for {session_key}',
exc_info=True,
)

Comment on lines 415 to 417
mock_logger.warning.assert_called()
warning_call = str(mock_logger.warning.call_args)
assert "Warning: Error during MCP session cleanup" in warning_call
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The test assertion for the log message can be made more robust. Instead of converting call_args to a string, it's better to inspect the arguments passed to mock_logger.warning directly. This makes the test less fragile and more explicit about what's being tested. Using assert_called_once() is also more precise than assert_called() when you expect a single call. This suggestion also aligns with the proposed change to the log message format.

Suggested change
mock_logger.warning.assert_called()
warning_call = str(mock_logger.warning.call_args)
assert "Warning: Error during MCP session cleanup" in warning_call
mock_logger.warning.assert_called_once()
args, kwargs = mock_logger.warning.call_args
assert 'Error during MCP session cleanup for session1' in args[0]
assert kwargs.get('exc_info')

@DineshThumma9
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly refactors error logging from using print to the standard logging module. The change to use logger.warning with exc_info=True is a significant improvement, as it provides more detailed exception information in the logs. The corresponding unit tests have been updated effectively to mock the logger and verify the new behavior. I've suggested one minor improvement to make the test assertion more specific.

# Error should be logged via logger.warning
mock_logger.warning.assert_called_once()
args, kwargs = mock_logger.warning.call_args
assert "Error during MCP session cleanup for session1" in args[0]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For a more precise test, it's better to assert the exact log message instead of using in. This ensures that the log message is exactly as expected and prevents accidental changes from going unnoticed.

Suggested change
assert "Error during MCP session cleanup for session1" in args[0]
assert "Error during MCP session cleanup for session1" == args[0]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mcp [Component] Issues about MCP support

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ADK using print in mcp_session_manager.py

2 participants