Skip to content

feat: add threat model document#5

Open
andreynering wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
threat-model
Open

feat: add threat model document#5
andreynering wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
threat-model

Conversation

@andreynering
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@andreynering andreynering commented Apr 22, 2026

Add a THREAT_MODEL.md that identifies security threats, assets, and mitigations for the Task project. Follows the same style as INCIDENT_RESPONSE_PLAN.md and includes Task-specific concerns such as remote Taskfile fetching, distribution channels, and shell execution.

💘 Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: Kimi K2.6 via Crush crush@charm.land


My prompt to Kimi K2.6:

Generate a THREAT_MODEL.md.

  • We want this to be relatively short.
  • It should mostly follow the same written style of the existing INCIDENT_RESPONSE_PLAN.md.
  • Use this one as inspiration: https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser-pro/blob/main/THREAT_MODEL.md
  • This is a .github repository. The actual project is on /Users/andrey/Developer/task/task, feel free to investigate the project.

Add a THREAT_MODEL.md that identifies security threats, assets,
and mitigations for the Task project. Follows the same style as
INCIDENT_RESPONSE_PLAN.md and includes Task-specific concerns
such as remote Taskfile fetching, distribution channels, and
shell execution.

💘 Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: Kimi K2.6 via Crush <crush@charm.land>
@andreynering andreynering requested review from pd93 and vmaerten April 22, 2026 00:06
@andreynering andreynering self-assigned this Apr 22, 2026
Comment thread THREAT_MODEL.md
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can add a link to this from the SECURITY.md file. Also, once we're happy with this, we should add it to our website like the IRP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants