Skip to content

[GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p] Netty epoll transport denial of service via RST on half-closed TCP connection#7640

Open
mpenttila wants to merge 1 commit into
mpenttila/advisory-improvement-7640from
mpenttila-GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p
Open

[GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p] Netty epoll transport denial of service via RST on half-closed TCP connection#7640
mpenttila wants to merge 1 commit into
mpenttila/advisory-improvement-7640from
mpenttila-GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p

Conversation

@mpenttila
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products

Comments
4.1.x is not vulnerable per netty/netty#16689

@github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

github commented May 11, 2026

Hi there @chrisvest! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 11, 2026 08:35
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to mpenttila/advisory-improvement-7640 May 11, 2026 08:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the affected version range for GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p (Netty epoll transport DoS on RST after half-close) to reflect that the issue starts in the 4.2.x line, aligning the machine-readable OSV range with the advisory’s notes that 4.1.x is not vulnerable.

Changes:

  • Adjusted the affected version range start from introduced: "0" to introduced: "4.2".
  • Kept the existing fix version boundary (fixed: "4.2.13.Final") unchanged.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants