Skip to content

chore: canary checker v1.1.3 blog#516

Open
yashmehrotra wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
cc-blog
Open

chore: canary checker v1.1.3 blog#516
yashmehrotra wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
cc-blog

Conversation

@yashmehrotra

@yashmehrotra yashmehrotra commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for chaining health checks, creating new checks from previous outputs, and targeting agents with flexible pattern-based selection.
    • Expanded HTTP and metrics checks with stronger auth, redirect handling, HAR capture, and TLS/mTLS options.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed issues affecting failure counts, uptime calculations, metric labels, orphaned scheduled checks, and missing transition timestamps.
  • Chores
    • Removed long-deprecated check types and added clearer messages for unsupported usage.
    • Included upgrade guidance and updated event permissions for Kubernetes integrations.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview Jul 3, 2026 9:20am

Request Review

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for canarychecker canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5b68a5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/canarychecker/deploys/6a477e79238dcb0007a14eca

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@yashmehrotra, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 44 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c24f7085-0bcf-4358-aa39-476939bcece1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 310cbe4 and a5b68a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • mission-control/blog/canary-checker-v1.2.md

Walkthrough

Adds a new release-notes blog document for Canary Checker v1.2, describing composable health checks, transformed canaries, agent selectors, TLS support, HTTP check enhancements, metrics/operational fixes, deprecation cleanup, upgrade guidance, and contributors.

Changes

Release notes documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Front-matter and overview
mission-control/blog/canary-checker-v1.2.md
Adds document front-matter and a v1.2 release overview summarizing composability, security, correctness, and cleanup themes.
New feature documentation
mission-control/blog/canary-checker-v1.2.md
Describes request chaining with dependsOn, transformed canaries with orphan cleanup, agentSelector multi-agent targeting, TLS/mTLS for Redis and Prometheus checks, and HTTP check enhancements (Digest auth, SigV4, HAR, maxRedirects).
Correctness and operational fixes
mission-control/blog/canary-checker-v1.2.md
Documents metrics correctness fixes (failure counters, PromQL precedence, label allowlist) and operational fixes (sync job race, lastTransitionedTime, RBAC for events.k8s.io/v1).
Deprecation cleanup and upgrade guidance
mission-control/blog/canary-checker-v1.2.md
Describes removal of deprecated check implementations with removal stubs, upgrade guidance including helm upgrade, and lists contributors.

Possibly related PRs

  • flanksource/docs#469: Documents distributed canaries with agentSelector patterns and derived-canary execution/cleanup, directly related to the multi-agent targeting feature described in this release notes doc.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title is relevant to the change, indicating a Canary Checker blog/update even though the version label is slightly off.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cc-blog
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch cc-blog

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant