-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 465
Highlight matched nodes in the stack chart when searching #5935
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
fatadel
wants to merge
1
commit into
firefox-devtools:main
Choose a base branch
from
fatadel:highlight-node-1818
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+140
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I thought a lot about this Set and the for loop here. I'm a bit scared of its performance impact and think it could be improved.
The possible issues I can see:
funcMatchesSearch:profiler/src/profile-logic/profile-data.ts
Lines 1812 to 1816 in d5eb4f2
funcMatchesSearchhere is a BitSet of all the funcTable. And we mostly care about the funcTable. Currently it uses callNodeIndex, but there is no reason not to check funcIndex below as we already have it.But this is a lot more architectural changes than this small change...
funcMatchesSearchis an local variable, which needs to be extracted and memoized. And then we can use that extracted BitSet in 2 places without computing it twice. And this would allow us store it and have a selector likegetSearchMatchedFuncs. Then instead of passingsearchStringsRegExphere, we would pass that bitset to this component. And the component only doescheckBit(searchMatchedFuncs, currentFuncIndex)instead.Since this is a much bigger change, I'm okay with landing this one. But let's at least file a bug about the improvements we can make.