Skip to content

Adjust wait for initial dialog contents in QuickAccessDialogTest#4027

Merged
trancexpress merged 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
trancexpress:gh4009
Jun 7, 2026
Merged

Adjust wait for initial dialog contents in QuickAccessDialogTest#4027
trancexpress merged 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
trancexpress:gh4009

Conversation

@trancexpress
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adjusted the wait for initial dialog contents in
QuickAccessDialogTest.testPreviousChoicesAvailableForExtension(), to rely on QuickAccessDialog.setInfoText() instead of relying on specific dialog contents set during the test.

See: #4009

@merks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

merks commented May 25, 2026

@trancexpress

Feel free to merge changes intended to fix/improve flaky tests.

@trancexpress
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Alright, though I have doubts this will help. I still see async code running despite the change, just less of it. The code in the job done listener is proving difficult to wait for... If that is even the cause for the I-build fails. So no rush from my side to merge this.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 25, 2026

Test Results

   861 files  ±0     861 suites  ±0   54m 21s ⏱️ - 2m 33s
 8 034 tests ±0   7 791 ✅ ±0  243 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
20 541 runs  ±0  19 886 ✅ ±0  655 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit f6ab4c0. ± Comparison against base commit de45bf4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

…g outputs

Adjusted the wait for initial dialog contents in
QuickAccessDialogTest.testPreviousChoicesAvailableForExtension(),
to rely on QuickAccessDialog.setInfoText() instead of relying
on specific dialog contents set during the test.

Additionally debug outputs are added when setting dialog contents,
the debug outputs are enabled for QuickAccessDialogTest.

See: eclipse-platform#4009
@trancexpress trancexpress merged commit a745737 into eclipse-platform:master Jun 7, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants