Skip to content

docs(legal): add Project Support / AS-IS disclaimer to README#43

Open
dgokeeffe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/project-support-disclaimer
Open

docs(legal): add Project Support / AS-IS disclaimer to README#43
dgokeeffe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/project-support-disclaimer

Conversation

@dgokeeffe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Adds the canonical Databricks Labs "Project Support" / AS-IS disclaimer to the top of README.md so users see it before evaluating the project.

Why

CoDA already has the binding legal text — LICENSE.md ships the standard Databricks License with a $1,000 aggregate liability cap and comprehensive warranty disclaimers, and NOTICE.md has full third-party attribution. But the README didn't surface either, so a user evaluating CoDA could plausibly assume it's a supported Databricks product because it's under the `databrickslabs/` org.

This block closes that gap.

Why immediately after the tagline (not at the bottom)

Standard Labs convention (`dqx`, `ucx`, `blueprint`) puts the disclaimer at the bottom. For CoDA specifically — a tool that exposes a workspace-credential-scoped shell + AI agents that act with full user authority — upfront placement is the responsible call. Readers see the AS-IS notice before they invest mental effort evaluating the product.

What's in the block

  • AS-IS / no-SLA disclaimer (verbatim from `databrickslabs/dqx`)
  • "File issues on GitHub" pointer
  • Cross-references to LICENSE.md + NOTICE.md so readers can find binding terms in one hop

Test plan

  • README still renders correctly (markdown linter passes locally)
  • Sathish review — anything you'd phrase differently?

This pull request and its description were written by Isaac.

databrickslabs/dqx and other Labs projects ship a prominent "Project
Support" block disclaiming SLAs and pointing users at the LICENSE for
binding terms. CoDA has the LICENSE.md (with $1,000 aggregate liability
cap + comprehensive warranty disclaimers) and NOTICE.md (full
third-party attribution), but the README didn't surface either.

Without this block, a user evaluating CoDA could plausibly assume it's
a supported Databricks product because it lives under the
databrickslabs/ org. The disclaimer closes that gap — and is placed
immediately after the tagline (not buried at the bottom) because the
tool exposes a workspace-credential-scoped shell and AI agents that
act with full user authority.

Text lifted from databrickslabs/dqx with one grammar tweak (singular
"It is provided AS-IS" since this is one project, not multiple).
Cross-references LICENSE.md and NOTICE.md so security-conscious readers
can find the binding legal text in one hop.

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant