Skip to content

Add content regarding Freemium and Summer Sale 2026#176

Merged
tobihagemann merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feature/add-summer-sale-2026
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

Add content regarding Freemium and Summer Sale 2026#176
tobihagemann merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feature/add-summer-sale-2026

Conversation

@SailReal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@SailReal SailReal changed the base branch from develop to main June 30, 2026 17:51
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Walkthrough

Four new blog posts (English and German) are added: one announcing the Cryptomator Android freemium model (read-only free access, in-app purchase to unlock full features, 30-day trial) and one for the Summer Sale 2026. The Android download pages are updated to link to the org.cryptomator.freemium Play Store listing with a secondary link to the full non-IAP version. FAQ answers in both languages are revised to include Android as free/read-only, update Android purchase instructions, and remove the now-redundant standalone Android freemium FAQ entry. The Tresorit comparison pages are updated to reflect the new freemium pricing model.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • cryptomator/cryptomator.github.io#133: Previously updated the same content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.{de,en}.md files for pricing/cost wording, directly overlapping with this PR's comparison page edits.

Suggested reviewers

  • CuriousPurah
  • overheadhunter
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so the intent cannot be assessed from the author text. Add a short description of the Freemium and Summer Sale 2026 content changes and affected pages.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: adding Freemium and Summer Sale 2026 content.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/add-summer-sale-2026

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content/blog/2026-07-01-cryptomator-android-freemium.de.md (1)

47-47: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low value

Unify compound noun spelling for consistency.

Use either "Lizenzschlüssel-Variante" or "Lizenzschlüsselvariante" consistently. The unhyphenated form matches the earlier "Lizenzschlüsselvarianten" and is preferred for German compounds.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@content/blog/2026-07-01-cryptomator-android-freemium.de.md` at line 47, The
compound noun spelling is inconsistent in this paragraph; update the phrase in
the affected blog content to use the same unhyphenated form as elsewhere in the
article. Keep the wording consistent with the earlier use of
Lizenzschlüsselvarianten by changing the single occurrence in this sentence from
the hyphenated variant to Lizenzschlüsselvariante.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.de.md`:
- Line 200: The comparison page content has been updated to the new Freemium
model, but the footer still shows an outdated “Stand” date. Update the footer’s
stand-date text in the same comparison page template/content so it reflects the
current revision and matches the new description.

In `@content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.en.md`:
- Line 203: Update the comparison page’s stale “as of” footer date to match the
new pricing content. Locate the footer/date text in the same markdown page as
the Cryptomator pricing paragraph and change the “Information as of September
2025” wording to the current month/year so the updated comparison reads
consistently.

In `@data/de/for_individuals_faq.yaml`:
- Line 28: The FAQ answer in for_individuals_faq.yaml now describes iOS and
Android as free but read-only, so the next financing entry must be updated to
match the freemium wording. Find the answer mentioning Cryptomator’s funding
model and replace the “paid mobile apps” phrasing with wording about in-app
purchases or mobile unlocks; keep the style consistent with the surrounding FAQ
entries and use the same terminology as the updated answer.

In `@data/de/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml`:
- Line 12: The FAQ answer currently implies that F-Droid is a purchase channel,
which is inconsistent with the later licensing text. Update the wording in the
pricing FAQ entry so that F-Droid is described only as a download/distribution
option, while the Android license key is clearly stated as being purchased and
used via the website; keep the existing APK mention and adjust the sentence
around the download/purchase flow in the pricing FAQ answer accordingly.

In `@data/en/for_individuals_faq.yaml`:
- Line 28: The freemium wording in the free/read-only FAQ entry now conflicts
with the adjacent funding FAQ answer, which still says Cryptomator is funded
through “paid mobile apps.” Update the related FAQ entry in the same section so
it reflects the new freemium model and stays consistent with the answer near the
Cryptomator availability text, keeping the wording aligned across both entries.

In `@data/en/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml`:
- Line 12: The pricing FAQ answer incorrectly treats F-Droid as a purchase
channel and implies the Android license key is obtained through it. Update the
response in the pricing_individuals_faq entry so the flow clearly says users can
download via APK or F-Droid, then buy/use the Android-only license key from the
website, while keeping the Google Play and withdrawal wording consistent.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@content/blog/2026-07-01-cryptomator-android-freemium.de.md`:
- Line 47: The compound noun spelling is inconsistent in this paragraph; update
the phrase in the affected blog content to use the same unhyphenated form as
elsewhere in the article. Keep the wording consistent with the earlier use of
Lizenzschlüsselvarianten by changing the single occurrence in this sentence from
the hyphenated variant to Lizenzschlüsselvariante.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fca91a67-ff96-4d48-a72f-cec31d49aa90

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbd0228 and fb3bbc3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • static/img/blog/cryptomator-android-freemium-screenshot.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • static/img/blog/cryptomator-android-freemium.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • static/img/blog/summer-sale-2026.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • content/blog/2026-07-01-cryptomator-android-freemium.de.md
  • content/blog/2026-07-01-cryptomator-android-freemium.en.md
  • content/blog/2026-07-01-summer-sale-2026.de.md
  • content/blog/2026-07-01-summer-sale-2026.en.md
  • content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.de.md
  • content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.en.md
  • content/downloads/android.de.html
  • content/downloads/android.en.html
  • data/de/for_individuals_faq.yaml
  • data/de/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml
  • data/en/for_individuals_faq.yaml
  • data/en/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml

Comment thread content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.de.md
Comment thread content/comparisons/tresorit-alternative.en.md
Comment thread data/de/for_individuals_faq.yaml
Comment thread data/de/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml
Comment thread data/en/for_individuals_faq.yaml
Comment thread data/en/pricing_individuals_faq.yaml
Refresh the as-of date on the Tresorit comparison pages (DE/EN) and reword the funding FAQ entries so they match the new mobile freemium model. Addresses CodeRabbit review on PR #176.
@SailReal SailReal requested a review from tobihagemann June 30, 2026 18:17
@tobihagemann tobihagemann merged commit 60ec700 into main Jul 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@tobihagemann tobihagemann deleted the feature/add-summer-sale-2026 branch July 1, 2026 07:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants