feat(cli): add --tag-format argument to changelog command

[jappja]

Description

This PR adds missing "--tag-format" argument to cz changelog command, similar to cz bump command.
The changelog command implementation already checks "tag_format" argument but cli support was just missing.

Checklist

• Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
• Run poetry all locally to ensure this change passes linter check and test
• Test the changes on the local machine manually
• Update the documentation for the changes

Expected behavior

Tag format can be given as argument to cz changelog command. The changelog command already checks "tag_format" argument:

commitizen/commitizen/commands/changelog.py

Line 85 in be02801

args.get("tag_format") or self.config.settings["tag_format"]

Steps to Test This Pull Request

Additional context

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.57%. Comparing base (120d514) to head (eb45ef5).
Report is 619 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1414      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.33%   97.57%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          42       57      +15     
  Lines        2104     2680     +576     
==========================================
+ Hits         2048     2615     +567     
- Misses         56       65       +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.57% <ø> (+0.23%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[noirbizarre]

I checked and the changelog command is actually already handling it but it was missing 👍🏼
Thanks !

[Lee-W]

let's wait for other doc changes and then merge this one

[bearomorphism]

let's wait for other doc changes and then merge this one

If you're referring to #1404, there is no dependencies. It's ok if you merge this one first.

[Lee-W]

it's not strickly blocking, wanted to get it released with docs but yep won't really hurt if we merge it first. let's do it 💪