Skip to content

🤖 refactor: remove workflow-smoke built-in skill#3615

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
workflows-kd21
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

🤖 refactor: remove workflow-smoke built-in skill#3615
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
workflows-kd21

Conversation

@ThomasK33

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Remove the hidden workflow-smoke built-in skill now that deep-research provides a real built-in skill-packaged workflow for exercising skill:// resolution paths in tests.

Implementation

  • Deleted the workflow-smoke built-in skill markdown and workflow script.
  • Regenerated built-in skill content so the removed skill is no longer packaged.
  • Updated built-in workflow resolution/tool tests to use skill://deep-research/workflow.js with isolated test skill roots so developer-global skills cannot shadow the built-in package.
  • Kept user-facing CLI/authoring examples cheap by using local workflow file examples instead of a costly packaged deep-research invocation.

Validation

  • bun test src/node/services/agentSkills/agentSkillsService.test.ts src/node/services/workflows/workflowScriptResolver.test.ts src/node/services/tools/workflow_run.test.ts
  • bun test src/node/services/mock/mockAiStreamPlayer.test.ts
  • bun test src/node/services/mock/mockAiStreamPlayer.test.ts -t 'does not let stale stream-end cleanup delete a replacement stream partial'
  • MUX_ESLINT_CONCURRENCY=1 make static-check
  • git diff --check
  • Local repro of failed CI isolated unit command: bun test --max-concurrency=1 src/node/services/workflows/WorkflowRunner.test.ts src/node/orpc/router.test.ts src/browser/components/WorkspaceHeartbeatModal/WorkspaceHeartbeatModal.test.tsx src/browser/features/Messages/InlineSkillMarkdown.test.tsx src/browser/hooks/useChatTranscriptFullWidth.test.tsx src/browser/utils/commands/sources.test.ts

Risks

Low. This removes a hidden fixture-only skill and leaves packaged built-in workflow coverage on the existing deep-research skill without exposing it as a cheap CLI smoke-test example.


Generated with mux • Model: openai:gpt-5.5 • Thinking: xhigh • Cost: 542744{MUX_COSTS_USD:-unknown}

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 82c3a4ec46

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/reference/cli.mdx Outdated
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Please take another look. I addressed the CLI smoke-test feedback by switching the docs example back to cheap local workflow files and avoiding a user-copyable deep-research invocation.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0f5915b224

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/node/services/tools/workflow_run.test.ts
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Please take another look. I addressed the built-in skill shadowing feedback by isolating skill roots for the deep-research built-in resolution tests.

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Please take another look after the rebase onto latest main.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: e137d8cd84

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 23, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 23, 2026
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7d6e94e Jun 23, 2026
40 of 42 checks passed
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 deleted the workflows-kd21 branch June 23, 2026 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant