docs: document 15-day PR activity window for new repositories

[jorgebraz]

Summary

• Added a note to managing-repositories.md explaining that when a repository is first added to Codacy, only pull requests with activity in the last 15 days are automatically analyzed
• The note also directs users to the manual reanalysis FAQ for older PRs

Test plan

• Verify the note renders correctly in the "Adding a repository" section of the managing repositories page
• Confirm the link to the reanalysis FAQ resolves correctly

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.06 (🔴 -0.01)

File	Readability
managing-repositories.md	56.47 (🔴 -1.7)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
managing-repositories.md	56.47	26.71	10.25	12.9	12.42	6.47
	🔴 -1.7	🔴 -0.3	🔴 -0.36	🔴 -0.3	🔴 -0.06	🔴 -0.16

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.06	42.94	10.95	12.33	12.24	8.02
	🔴 -0.01	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 0 minor issue)
0 new security issue
More details

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

[codacy-production]

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issues (≤ 0 minor issues)
0 new security issues
More details

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

[codacy-production]

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issues (≤ 0 minor issues)
0 new security issues
More details

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

The pull request successfully implements the documentation for the 15-day activity window for newly added repositories, aligning with the intended acceptance criteria. Codacy analysis confirms the changes are up to standards with no new quality or complexity issues.

The main point of attention is the specificity of the manual reanalysis link. Although the link is valid, it directs users to repository-level instructions rather than pull-request-specific actions. Ensuring this link points to the most relevant documentation will prevent user confusion when attempting to analyze older PRs.

Test suggestions

• Verify the presence and wording of the 15-day activity window note in docs/organizations/managing-repositories.md
• Verify the relative path to the manual reanalysis FAQ (../faq/repositories/how-do-i-reanalyze-my-repository.md) is valid

---

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

[codacy-production]

_{🟡 MEDIUM RISK}

Suggestion: The link currently points to repository reanalysis, which might not be the correct procedure for analyzing specific older pull requests. If there is a documentation page dedicated to reanalyzing pull requests, it would be a more appropriate target.

Try running the following prompt in your coding agent:

Search for a documentation file specifically about reanalyzing pull requests (e.g., in docs/faq/pull-requests/) and update the link in docs/organizations/managing-repositories.md if a more specific guide exists.