Skip to content

Fix Host setup when persistent networks exist#12751

Draft
Pearl1594 wants to merge 1 commit into4.22from
fix-persistent-ntwk-host-setup
Draft

Fix Host setup when persistent networks exist#12751
Pearl1594 wants to merge 1 commit into4.22from
fix-persistent-ntwk-host-setup

Conversation

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes: #12718

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.61%. Comparing base (58916eb) to head (d186b15).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ain/java/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkDaoImpl.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #12751      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.61%   17.61%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    15666    15665       -1     
============================================
  Files          5917     5917              
  Lines        531400   531401       +1     
  Branches      64970    64970              
============================================
- Hits          93602    93596       -6     
- Misses       427244   427252       +8     
+ Partials      10554    10553       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.70% <ø> (ø)
unittests 18.68% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants