UI: Fix api method to getAPI in SearchFilter.vue

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR fixes api calls in SearchFilter added in 4.20. The API methods were changed from api to getAPI & postAPI. This PR updates the same for SearchFilter.vue.
#10899

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates API method calls in SearchFilter.vue from the deprecated api function to the new getAPI and postAPI functions, aligning with changes introduced in PR #10899 which adds support for enforcing POST requests on state-changing APIs.

Changes:

• Updated import statement to use getAPI and postAPI instead of api
• Replaced 4 api() calls with appropriate getAPI() or postAPI() calls

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.61%. Comparing base (30d3066) to head (33c2519).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #12558      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.62%   17.61%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    15664    15666       +2     
============================================
  Files          5915     5915              
  Lines        531144   531144              
  Branches      64930    64930              
============================================
- Hits          93591    93587       -4     
- Misses       427015   427021       +6     
+ Partials      10538    10536       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.71% <0.00%> (ø)
unittests	18.69% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/12558 (QA-JID-865)

[DaanHoogland]

this does not look good in QA, checking to see if this is a 21 vs 22 issue.

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16652

[sureshanaparti]

clgtm

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16653

[shwstppr]

Lgtm

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[sureshanaparti]

@vishesh92 I think, I resolved these ui changes in forward merge, check and close this PR if not required anymore.