fix: fix missing details in json output when running uipath eval#1382
Open
bai-uipath wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
fix: fix missing details in json output when running uipath eval#1382bai-uipath wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bai-uipath wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
test:uipath-langchain
bai-uipath
changed the title
bai-uipath
force-pushed
the
bai/fix-missing-details-eval
branch
from
6823ddb to
8c9672a
Compare
bai-uipath
force-pushed
the
bai/fix-missing-details-eval
branch
from
b91b18c to
cab154f
Compare
bai-uipath
force-pushed
the
bai/fix-missing-details-eval
branch
from
cab154f to
fcc29ed
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes issue #1369:
--verbosecli flag to seteval_context.verbosewhich controls whether agent trace is included in the json.BaseModelserializer rather than the runtime type (eg:LLMJudgeJustification).After this change, the following command works as expected in the calculator sample: