Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 2 minutes and 53 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request updates agent configuration metadata and contributor workflow documentation. Changes include adding Changes
Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@CLAUDE.md`:
- Line 39: Remove the duplicated workflow sentence "Always use these agents
rather than running the commands directly. After making source file changes:
build, then run tests, then run quality checks, then run code review - all
required steps must pass before the work is done." (the earlier occurrence) so
the Development section remains the single source of truth; if you want "code
review" included in the workflow instead, add that phrase to the existing
Development workflow sentence rather than keeping both copies.
- Line 82: The rule text "Update json-rpc schema spec when updating json-rpc
related code" is ambiguous; update the rule to specify the schema's repository
location and file path, the expected format (e.g., JSON Schema vX), and the
update procedure (run generator/validation tool and open a PR updating
path/to/schema.json), and replace the placeholder "path/to/schema.json" with the
actual path and a short command or tool name (e.g.,
"tools/json-schema-generator" or "scripts/validate-schema.sh"); reference the
rule string "Update json-rpc schema spec when updating json-rpc related code" so
contributors can find and edit the rule text accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 6ce9b39d-ae9b-4ae0-af40-5e214b45fcf7
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.claude/agents/build.md.claude/agents/quality.md.claude/agents/test-runner.mdCLAUDE.md
CLAUDE.md
Outdated
| - Prefer readability and maintainability over using the latest C++ features (avoid syntax sugar that may be less familiar to new contributors). | ||
| - Avoid lambda expressions with more than 2 captures or multiple statements; use named functions instead for clarity. | ||
| - Make sure to document public functions with brief Doxygen comments in the source file | ||
| - Update json-rpc schema spec when updating json-rpc related code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify json-rpc schema spec update requirement.
The new rule requires updating the "json-rpc schema spec" when modifying related code, but lacks essential context: where is the schema spec located, what format is it in, and how should contributors update it?
📝 Suggested improvement
-- Update json-rpc schema spec when updating json-rpc related code
+- Update json-rpc schema spec (located at `path/to/schema.json`) when updating json-rpc related codeReplace path/to/schema.json with the actual path.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@CLAUDE.md` at line 82, The rule text "Update json-rpc schema spec when
updating json-rpc related code" is ambiguous; update the rule to specify the
schema's repository location and file path, the expected format (e.g., JSON
Schema vX), and the update procedure (run generator/validation tool and open a
PR updating path/to/schema.json), and replace the placeholder
"path/to/schema.json" with the actual path and a short command or tool name
(e.g., "tools/json-schema-generator" or "scripts/validate-schema.sh"); reference
the rule string "Update json-rpc schema spec when updating json-rpc related
code" so contributors can find and edit the rule text accordingly.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Documentation
Chores