Make the node graph use Table<GradientStops> instead of GradientStops#3837
Make the node graph use Table<GradientStops> instead of GradientStops#3837
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Keavon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the internal representation and handling of gradient stops within the node graph system. By standardizing the use of Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the node graph to consistently use Table<GradientStops> instead of GradientStops directly. This change improves consistency with how other types like Color are handled. The refactoring touches many files, including node definitions, UI property generation, data type handling, and document migrations. The changes are logical and well-executed. I've found one minor issue in the colors_to_gradient node implementation, which I've commented on.
f5ff808 to
94320f4
Compare
Partly closes #2779