Is this a new report?
Yes
System Info
Void 5.10.256_1 x86_64-musl
Package(s) Affected
dracut-109_1
Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
No response
Expected behaviour
Boot normally from the generated an initramfs image
Actual behaviour
When I boot my device with this image it errors - the console displays that my
root partition is already mounted on my /media partition, which it is
apparently, with my other 2 partitions. Consequently I have to reboot my device
with my last good initramfs image that was generated with Dracut v0.7.
The initramfs image file produced is a lot smaller than when using Dracut v0.7,
infact it is almost the same as if I produced it using the --host-only flag
with Dracut v0.7, about 11-13M.
I have reverted back to the previous version of Dracut, v0.7, and regenerated the
initramfs image for the latest 2 kernels, which were original generated using
latest Dracut, v0.9, & my device boots fine once again using these regenerated
initramfs images.
If I produce an initramfs image with Dracut v0.7 using the --host-only flag
that image too has the same issue as with Dracut v0.9 with no flags & I stated
above it is approximate the same size.
So has the latest Dracut v0.9 been compiled with --host-only flag? If not have
you got an explanation for this occurrence?
Steps to reproduce
- Have Dracut v0.9 installed
- Have generated an initramfs image with Dracut v0.9 installed
- Boot from that initramfs image generated with Dracut v0.9
Is this a new report?
Yes
System Info
Void 5.10.256_1 x86_64-musl
Package(s) Affected
dracut-109_1
Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
No response
Expected behaviour
Boot normally from the generated an initramfs image
Actual behaviour
When I boot my device with this image it errors - the console displays that my
root partition is already mounted on my /media partition, which it is
apparently, with my other 2 partitions. Consequently I have to reboot my device
with my last good initramfs image that was generated with Dracut v0.7.
The initramfs image file produced is a lot smaller than when using Dracut v0.7,
infact it is almost the same as if I produced it using the --host-only flag
with Dracut v0.7, about 11-13M.
I have reverted back to the previous version of Dracut, v0.7, and regenerated the
initramfs image for the latest 2 kernels, which were original generated using
latest Dracut, v0.9, & my device boots fine once again using these regenerated
initramfs images.
If I produce an initramfs image with Dracut v0.7 using the --host-only flag
that image too has the same issue as with Dracut v0.9 with no flags & I stated
above it is approximate the same size.
So has the latest Dracut v0.9 been compiled with --host-only flag? If not have
you got an explanation for this occurrence?
Steps to reproduce