[cmp.categories.pre] Anonymous parameter or unnamed parameter?

[frederick-vs-ja]

In the current standard wording, the word "anonymous" is almost always used together with union. There's only one exceptions - "anonymous parameter" in [cmp.categories.pre] ("anonymous namespace" in [diff.cpp03.dcl.dcl] was fixed by #9061).

I wonder whether we should say "unnamed parameter" instead. It seems to me that "unnamed" is a more general adjective, but currently the standard wording doesn't say "unnamed parameter" anywhere.

[SainoNamkho]

How does their usage differ in the draft? If I look away from standard wording, in natural language, I may think "anonymous" means one have a name, but make it inaccessible to others, while "unnamed" one doesn't have a name inherently. So anonymous can be used to modify any terms that have names, while it is always needed to explicitly define what unnamed foobar means?

[frederick-vs-ja]

How does their usage differ in the draft?

Now they're modifying totally distinct terms. The current wording only say "anonymous union" and "anonymous parameter", while use "unnamed" with other stuffs.

If I look away from standard wording, in natural language, I may think "anonymous" means one have a name, but make it inaccessible to others, while "unnamed" one doesn't have a name inherently.

With such interpretation, we should use "unnamed" throughout the standard wording, as "anonymous" is unhelpful and even possibly misleading.