🐞 bug report
Affected Rule
py_binary + py_library
Is this a regression?
Yes, it started with 2.0.0, before that the problem was not there
Description
It is no longer possible to have a lib.py in the root and import it.
It seems that this colides now with some lib that is in the path. This was before not the case.
Considering that lib is not a Python library, I would not have expected having any colision.
🔬 Minimal Reproduction
You can grab this example and upgrade to rules_python 2.0.0
https://github.com/limdor/bazel-examples/tree/v1.8.0/python
🔥 Exception or Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:\b\t45fapsg\execroot\_main\bazel-out\x64_windows-fastbuild-st-591ff087943d\bin\bin.exe.runfiles\_main\_bin_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 541, in <module>
main()
File "c:\b\t45fapsg\execroot\_main\bazel-out\x64_windows-fastbuild-st-591ff087943d\bin\bin.exe.runfiles\_main\_bin_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 535, in main
_run_py_path(main_filename, args=sys.argv[1:])
File "c:\b\t45fapsg\execroot\_main\bazel-out\x64_windows-fastbuild-st-591ff087943d\bin\bin.exe.runfiles\_main\_bin_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 323, in _run_py_path
runpy.run_path(main_filename, run_name="__main__")
File "<frozen runpy>", line 291, in run_path
File "<frozen runpy>", line 98, in _run_module_code
File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
File "c:\b\t45fapsg\execroot\_main\bazel-out\x64_windows-fastbuild-st-591ff087943d\bin\bin.exe.runfiles\_main\bin.py", line 1, in <module>
from lib import sum
ImportError: cannot import name 'sum' from 'lib' (C:\temp\bazel._bin.venv.l8l95vit\lib\__init__.py)
bazel run failed with exit code 1
🌍 Your Environment
Operating System:
Windows
Output of bazel version:
8.7.0
Rules_python version:
2.0.0 as well as 2.0.1
Anything else relevant?
That is not a big issue for me, I workaround the problem my renaming lib.py to my_lib.py. However the bigger question would be what are the names that can have problems and the ones that not? I could have imagine names from the Python standard library to have problems with it but afaik lib is not one of them.
🐞 bug report
Affected Rule
py_binary + py_library
Is this a regression?
Yes, it started with 2.0.0, before that the problem was not there
Description
It is no longer possible to have a
lib.pyin the root and import it.It seems that this colides now with some lib that is in the path. This was before not the case.
Considering that lib is not a Python library, I would not have expected having any colision.
🔬 Minimal Reproduction
You can grab this example and upgrade to rules_python 2.0.0
https://github.com/limdor/bazel-examples/tree/v1.8.0/python
🔥 Exception or Error
🌍 Your Environment
Operating System:
Windows
Output of
bazel version:8.7.0
Rules_python version:
2.0.0 as well as 2.0.1
Anything else relevant?
That is not a big issue for me, I workaround the problem my renaming
lib.pytomy_lib.py. However the bigger question would be what are the names that can have problems and the ones that not? I could have imagine names from the Python standard library to have problems with it but afaik lib is not one of them.