From b508a91411f4fa5a440ee00d7d3234faae0bce6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: toniseibold Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 15:49:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] correct CO2 liquefaction --- inputs/manual_input.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2020.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2025.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2030.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2035.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2040.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2045.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/US/costs_2050.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2020.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2025.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2030.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2035.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2040.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2045.csv | 11 +++++------ outputs/costs_2050.csv | 11 +++++------ 15 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) diff --git a/inputs/manual_input.csv b/inputs/manual_input.csv index c49112ee..ed2e7bed 100644 --- a/inputs/manual_input.csv +++ b/inputs/manual_input.csv @@ -192,12 +192,11 @@ NH3 (l) storage tank incl. liquefaction,lifetime,2020,20,years,2010,"Morgan E. 2 CO2 storage tank,investment,2050,2430,EUR/t_CO2,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, Table 3.","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,FOM,2050,1,%/year,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,lifetime,2050,25,years,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." -CO2 liquefaction,investment,2004,12.8928283642224,EUR/t_CO2/h,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction." -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2004,5,%/year,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf ., -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2004,25,years,2004,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process." -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes. -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf ., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,"Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),investment,2012,160,EUR/m^3,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 8F .",Assumed at the higher end for addon facilities/mid-range for stand-alone facilities. Product storage usually smaller due to higher requirements on safety and different construction method. Reference size used here: 40 000 - 60 000 m^3 . General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),FOM,2012,6.25,%/year,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , figure 7 and pg. 12 .",Assuming ca. 10 EUR/m^3/a (center value between stand alone and addon facility). General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),lifetime,2012,30,years,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 11.", diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv index 962739c9..958c0db4 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv index 1323c389..efde52e2 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv index 7a853548..d1de148e 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv index ffecc32b..955d4621 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv index 79ee49bc..c6f2914c 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv index 23d4ac38..21277fc5 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv index c5d89281..2aa0b0bc 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv @@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/costs_2020.csv index 1dbe1cc7..74aeb012 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2020.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/costs_2025.csv index bb26c697..a99a138a 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2025.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/costs_2030.csv index aafd3b65..431e5cf8 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2030.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/costs_2035.csv index 6b6cb09d..e884773d 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2035.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/costs_2040.csv index 61c88a65..59666785 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2040.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/costs_2045.csv index 0a04f69e..f3214b1d 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2045.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/costs_2050.csv index f5570cf9..0b9fa358 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2050.csv @@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, -CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., -CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 From 43f9d983e38edb3bc2c9d95d38bc7fd0d69af440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: toniseibold Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:50:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] add release notes --- docs/release_notes.rst | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/release_notes.rst b/docs/release_notes.rst index 278b69b3..16e10ca2 100644 --- a/docs/release_notes.rst +++ b/docs/release_notes.rst @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Upcoming Release .. The features listed below are not released yet, but will be part of the next release! .. To use the features already you have to use the ``master`` branch. +* Update technology data for carbon dioxide compression step to dense phase for transport in large pipelines. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) + * Add missing discount rate for OCGT in US-specific data. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/269) `v0.14.0 `__ (13th February 2026) From f80d2ea1c46071b9f9b167242e4b22d29e749b4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bobby <36541459+bobbyxng@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:33:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Potential fix for pull request finding Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --- docs/release_notes.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/release_notes.rst b/docs/release_notes.rst index 16e10ca2..9b70d1c0 100644 --- a/docs/release_notes.rst +++ b/docs/release_notes.rst @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Upcoming Release .. The features listed below are not released yet, but will be part of the next release! .. To use the features already you have to use the ``master`` branch. -* Update technology data for carbon dioxide compression step to dense phase for transport in large pipelines. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) +* Update technology data for `CO2 liquefaction`, i.e. the dense-phase carbon dioxide compression/liquefaction step for transport in large pipelines. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) * Add missing discount rate for OCGT in US-specific data. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/269) From 92127f46bda870703c88d3dec1327776638c117c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: toniseibold Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:23:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ensure backward compatibility by preserving technology data --- docs/release_notes.rst | 2 +- inputs/manual_input.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2020.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2025.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2030.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2035.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2040.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2045.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/US/costs_2050.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2020.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2025.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2030.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2035.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2040.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2045.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- outputs/costs_2050.csv | 16 +++++++++++----- 16 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/release_notes.rst b/docs/release_notes.rst index 9b70d1c0..07290116 100644 --- a/docs/release_notes.rst +++ b/docs/release_notes.rst @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Upcoming Release .. The features listed below are not released yet, but will be part of the next release! .. To use the features already you have to use the ``master`` branch. -* Update technology data for `CO2 liquefaction`, i.e. the dense-phase carbon dioxide compression/liquefaction step for transport in large pipelines. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) +* Add technology data for `CO2 dense phase compression` step for transport in large pipelines (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273) which is different from the current `CO2 liquefaction` technology parameters that is take for ship transport. * Add missing discount rate for OCGT in US-specific data. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/269) diff --git a/inputs/manual_input.csv b/inputs/manual_input.csv index ed2e7bed..c0cab904 100644 --- a/inputs/manual_input.csv +++ b/inputs/manual_input.csv @@ -192,11 +192,17 @@ NH3 (l) storage tank incl. liquefaction,lifetime,2020,20,years,2010,"Morgan E. 2 CO2 storage tank,investment,2050,2430,EUR/t_CO2,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, Table 3.","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,FOM,2050,1,%/year,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,lifetime,2050,25,years,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." -CO2 liquefaction,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,"Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,"Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 liquefaction,investment,2004,12.8928283642224,EUR/t_CO2/h,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction." +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2004,5,%/year,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf ., +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2004,25,years,2004,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process." +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes. +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf ., General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),investment,2012,160,EUR/m^3,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 8F .",Assumed at the higher end for addon facilities/mid-range for stand-alone facilities. Product storage usually smaller due to higher requirements on safety and different construction method. Reference size used here: 40 000 - 60 000 m^3 . General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),FOM,2012,6.25,%/year,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , figure 7 and pg. 12 .",Assuming ca. 10 EUR/m^3/a (center value between stand alone and addon facility). General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),lifetime,2012,30,years,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 11.", diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv index 958c0db4..42124d30 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv index efde52e2..66ba81b5 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv index d1de148e..09a2e92d 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv index 955d4621..750c1a97 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv index c6f2914c..6e0521ac 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv index 21277fc5..fa103a77 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv index 2aa0b0bc..5ecb5e48 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv @@ -134,11 +134,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,, CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,, -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,, +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,, +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,, CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,, CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,, diff --git a/outputs/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/costs_2020.csv index 74aeb012..0483c680 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2020.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/costs_2025.csv index a99a138a..9c23dcc3 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2025.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/costs_2030.csv index 431e5cf8..0325d8f3 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2030.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/costs_2035.csv index e884773d..27ced5fe 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2035.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/costs_2040.csv index 59666785..a8398223 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2040.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/costs_2045.csv index f3214b1d..3f8d8d29 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2045.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 diff --git a/outputs/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/costs_2050.csv index 0b9fa358..6629019d 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2050.csv @@ -103,11 +103,17 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.", -CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, -CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 -CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, +CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 +CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", +CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,, +CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes., +CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0 +CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0 From 236bd9c3fc9d633d21e09e9e9ba8a4bf9df6ab18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: toniseibold Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:35:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Add conversion calculation --- inputs/manual_input.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2020.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2025.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2030.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2035.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2040.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2045.csv | 2 +- outputs/US/costs_2050.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2020.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2025.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2030.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2035.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2040.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2045.csv | 2 +- outputs/costs_2050.csv | 2 +- 15 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/inputs/manual_input.csv b/inputs/manual_input.csv index c0cab904..57d482ac 100644 --- a/inputs/manual_input.csv +++ b/inputs/manual_input.csv @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ NH3 (l) storage tank incl. liquefaction,lifetime,2020,20,years,2010,"Morgan E. 2 CO2 storage tank,investment,2050,2430,EUR/t_CO2,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, Table 3.","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,FOM,2050,1,%/year,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." CO2 storage tank,lifetime,2050,25,years,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary." -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", "Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h" CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf", CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.", CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv index 42124d30..bcd985a2 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv index 66ba81b5..9cde2344 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv index 09a2e92d..0ce92b44 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv index 750c1a97..1c66a292 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv index 6e0521ac..d67f442d 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv index fa103a77..d98a5e26 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv index 5ecb5e48..0d84b9c9 100644 --- a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,, +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0,, CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,, CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,, CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,, diff --git a/outputs/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/costs_2020.csv index 0483c680..f72ff7fe 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2020.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2020.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/costs_2025.csv index 9c23dcc3..c5beb7f6 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2025.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2025.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/costs_2030.csv index 0325d8f3..e23f138d 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2030.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2030.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/costs_2035.csv index 27ced5fe..678a7fb2 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2035.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2035.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/costs_2040.csv index a8398223..58f2a387 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2040.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2040.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/costs_2045.csv index 3f8d8d29..54167ca6 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2045.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2045.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.", diff --git a/outputs/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/costs_2050.csv index 6629019d..da06f436 100644 --- a/outputs/costs_2050.csv +++ b/outputs/costs_2050.csv @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): En CO2 dense phase compression,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,, CO2 dense phase compression,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,, -CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0 +CO2 dense phase compression,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf," ""Conversion: 19 Mio. EUR / (5 Mt/yr) = 19*1e6 EUR / (5*1e6 t * (1/8760) h) = 33 288 EUR/t/h""",2024.0 CO2 dense phase compression,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0 CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0 CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",