CI does not appear to save the output of Makfile.PL in the job run logs

[KJ7LNW]

Maybe it does, but I couldn't find the output here:

https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl-linearalgebra/runs/7588380931?check_suite_focus=true

Could something like this be added? I'm not sure where it would be placed:

perl Makefile.PL 2>&1 | tee makemaker.log
cat makemaker.log

[mohawk2]

The problem here (as a reading of that log plus inferences about the CI config) is that cpanm will be running the Makefile.PL to get the deps, then this bit: https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl-linearalgebra/runs/7588380931?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:306 which says:

    if [ -f Makefile.PL ]; then
      ( [ -f Makefile ] || $BUILD_RUNNER_PREFIX $MYPERL Makefile.PL )

and chooses not to rerun the file because the Makefile will already exist. @zmughal Would it cause problems to rerun the Makefile.PL (etc) even if it the generated file already exists?

[KJ7LNW]

If there is a log then we could cat the cpanm deps log after it pulls them down. Whatever makes the most sense...

[zmughal]

The log is already output if the cpanm command fails by using

|| cat ~/.cpanm/build.log

here

devops/github-actions/ci-dist/action.yml

Line 337 in 8c0ce76

$BUILD_RUNNER_PREFIX $MYPERL -S cpanm -n --installdeps --with-develop . || cat ~/.cpanm/build.log

Is this for debugging purposes? Because if you need to debug, it is better to log in to the CI machine using https://github.com/mxschmitt/action-tmate.

[mohawk2]

The idea is to debug the output of the Makefile.PL itself, hence my question. But I agree the action-tmate option is better.

[zmughal]

I think there can be an option to make the output verbose for that part. I want to keep the logs mostly quiet (except for the tests) if there are no CI problems.

[mohawk2]

I like the idea of quiet logs and a quiet Makefile.PL, which is why PDL's Makefile.PL is now much less chatty than in the past. I would say that it's usually valuable to show Makefile.PL output, or at least shouldn't be a problem.