Reviewer 2 - Vision - comment 3

[Chilipp]

Reviewer comments:

Module 3 (“Development services”) includes a success story about mobile app development at Manchester. This is only one example. Add a second example from a different discipline (e.g., life sciences or engineering) to show generalizability.

[dokempf]

mobile app development is a cross-cutting technology and as such well-suited to illustrate this here. I don't see a need to show generalizability.

[ljgarcia]

Reply to the comment 13 (not 3 but 13)

A mobile app development was selected as it is domain-agnostic enough. We have added a sentence at the end of the success story clarifying this.

[ljgarcia]

Sentence to be added

Similar advantages to having this expertise centralised are relevant to other institutions where research software development happens without any interaction between units.

[ljgarcia]

Hi @Chilipp I added a possible answer to the reviewer and also a possible addition to the text. Who should I name as reviewer? Or how do I ping a large group for them to vote or suggest changes?

[Chilipp]

Hi @Chilipp I added a possible answer to the reviewer and also a possible addition to the text.

where did you add this answer @ljgarcia ? did you create a PR?

Who should I name as reviewer? Or how do I ping a large group for them to vote or suggest changes?

@dokempf did make an answer to this in #175 (comment), so maybe add him as a reviewer? I don't think we have an option here in this repo to ping a large group via a simple name, there is no team or so

[ljgarcia]

Actions done:

• Sentence for the response
• Sentence to be added to the success story

@dokempf could you please have a look to those two sentences and let me know if they are ready to go to a PR? Thanks

[dokempf]

@ljgarcia It is much easier to review if you just open the PR with the current state.

[ljgarcia]

See PR #221