Remove Neo Research from Voters

[grantshares-dapp]

Neo Research’s participation in Proposal #152 clearly demonstrates why they should not hold voting power in GrantShares. Their endorsement was issued without any meaningful analysis, due diligence, or challenge to the applicant’s claims.

They did not request clarification, milestones, or measurable outputs. They simply appeared in the discussion to signal approval, even though nothing in the proposal met the GrantShares criteria for ecosystem value, builder activity, or deliverable planning. After endorsing the proposal, Neo Research made no effort to follow up on the promised deliverables, no attempt to verify progress, and no accountability review afterward.

The endorsement served as a rubber stamp, not an evaluation. When a voting member behaves as a passive validator rather than an independent reviewer, the DAO becomes a formality, not a governance system. Removing Neo Research from the voter set is necessary to protect trust in the process and to ensure that future decisions are based on competence, scrutiny, and responsibility rather than casual approval.

---

Proposal Info 📋

• Proposal Type: remove-member

• Member Public Key: 0x02b74c87e111ba8b570ef02a01d832fb7a5b473038992c5882859066ee3c3eb8d9

• Member Address: NZHQrdpxvNLtikcpibVXBRHhBLF6SAb9WT

• Created by: @lock9 🚀

• Proposal : https://grantshares.io/app/details/b70a605a8c733bee373290f001627d2f

• Linked Proposal: https://grantshares.io/app/details/1bc359cd073735be06a1d6c2eebe6c48

• Raw Intents: 👀

[ {
  "target_contract" : "0xf15976ea5c020aaa12b9989aa9880e990eb5dcc9",
  "method" : "removeMember",
  "params" : [ {
    "type" : "PublicKey",
    "value" : "02b74c87e111ba8b570ef02a01d832fb7a5b473038992c5882859066ee3c3eb8d9"
  } ],
  "call_flags" : 11
} ]

---

👇 React with 👍 if you liked it, or 👎 if you think this proposal can be enhanced!